Losing the war - #2

2006/12/17

Permalink 05:06:09 pm, by thepessimist Email , 495 words, 375 views   English (CA)
Categories: Politics

Losing the war - #2

Richard Nixon declared "war on drugs" in 1971, and the war was escalated by every (Republican) president since. So, how's that going, eh?

There were previous wars on drugs, though they weren't called that at the time: Opium was banned in 1880, Alcohol was banned in 1919, Reefer Madness banned marijuana in 1937. But it was Ronald Reagan in the 1980's that really got the hearts and minds of government focussed on abolishing mind altering substances (except alcohol, of course). Nancy Reagan told youth to "just say no", and Bonzo mobilized the full force of the CIA, FBI, Coast Guard, ATF and every other bureaucrat, with or without a gun, to the cause.

The war was equally fought against Columbian drug lords and teenagers possessing a single spliff (or whatever the cool people call a "joint" these days). Crossing the border with a single seed of marijuana landed you in prison for the rest of your life. So, they're winning -- right?

The war has certainly had an effect.

  • organized crime is flourishing on the premium profits to be made in contraband.
  • addicts are criminals so cannot seek help to fight their addiction and must steal or prostitute themselves to afford their drug of choice.
  • al Qaeda was born and remains fully funded by profits made from poppy fields in Afghanistan.
  • terrorists and run of the mill criminals can afford the best guns, bombs, forged documents and bribed officials that money can buy.

Good job guys.

Insanity
This same policy is now being carried out in Afghanistan. Afghanistan supplies 90% of the world's illegal heroin. Agents of the U.S. are roaming the countryside burning or defoliating the poppy crops. These crops are the primary source of income for these ignorant dirt-poor people.
al Qaeda buys the crops and the U.S burns them, leaving them to starve. Do you wonder why the peasants choose to support or at least tolerate al Qaeda?

Now, notice the word "illegal" above. Did you know that there was a world market for "legal" heroin? There is, and most of it comes from Turkey. Turkey got an exemption that allowed them to keep their poppy fields when they lost WWI. Legal heroin is used by the medical world as a pain killer. Dr. Gifford Jones has been campaigning his whole life for the expansion of the use of heroin in palliative care. Heroin is the best pain killer, bar none, by a wide margin. When cancer is eating you alive one organ at a time, and the right-to-lifers are marching to prevent your euthanasia, a shot of heroin would make you care not at all. But, instead, people are required to die in agonizing pain, and doctors don't prescribe heroin for two reasons:

  1. the stigma attached to heroin
  2. the world wide shortage of legal heroin

If we were to make Afghanistan's poppy fields legal, we would take the guns out of al Qaeda's hands and guaranty a peaceful "twilight sleep" when cancer knocks at our door.

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: thepessimist [Member] Email
Found this conversation at the Ontario Legislature while following back somebody's search to this site on "Heroin Palliative Ontario"

Mr Runciman: Another area which doesn't touch on yours at all, but it's sort of been an interest of mine for many, many years, is the use of heroin as a painkiller for the terminally ill. I know that the federal government made changes a number of years ago to allow heroin once again to be imported for use by medical doctors.

As I understand it, and I've just recently been contacted by constituents of mine who've had their loved ones pass away in great pain, not being able to deal with the pain with the drugs that are being utilized by the medical community, apparently heroin is legally there if a practitioner wishes to draw upon it. The medical community, by and large, is still refusing to do so and hospitals are refusing to put it in their pharmacies and so on. I wonder if you have any view or observation on that.

Dr Bernstein: I'm not a clinician. Going back to the question about palliative care, I think it really highlights the importance of having guidelines for cancer research and for palliative care and what those guidelines should be. I can't comment, but if heroin is an acceptable drug to be used in palliative care, then that should be discussed and then formalized as a guideline so we don't have these situations where some people have access to it and some people don't, depending on who their doctor happens to be.

The Chair: Thank you. Dr Bernstein, I just would like to say that it isn't very often that we have someone like you in our presence whom we are in a position to say thank you to.
PermalinkPermalink 2007/01/29 @ 13:30

You cannot make a comment unless you are a registered user

You may, however, if you like use Haloscan comments without registering.

The Pessimist

A place to vent on the general stupidity of the world.

September 2010
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
 << <   > >>
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      

Search

Categories

Misc

XML Feeds

What is RSS?

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 3

powered by b2evolution free blog software